Certification scheme
Each scheme defines the competencies, eligibility, assessment requirements and maintenance rules for a specific AI security role.

Trust in a credential is earned through independent standards, defensible examinations and transparent candidate protections.
Personnel Certification Body · Certificate LCL/4624/0626
From defining competence to maintaining a credential, these safeguards make the qualification meaningful to candidates and employers.
Every credential begins with a defined professional role, an evidence-informed assessment plan and defensible scoring.
Each scheme defines the competencies, eligibility, assessment requirements and maintenance rules for a specific AI security role.
The certification body governs assessment and credential decisions against the scheme, rather than awarding a credential merely for attending a course.
An examination blueprint sets the domains, learning outcomes and relative weighting used to sample the competencies a role demands.
Job-task analysis relates real work to NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS to keep assessments relevant to current practice.
Subject matter experts author and review questions for technical accuracy, clarity, role relevance and coverage of the blueprint.
Statistical item analysis reviews question performance, difficulty and discrimination to identify items that need revision or retirement.
Criterion-referenced standard setting, such as Modified Angoff, establishes a defensible competence threshold rather than grading candidates against one another.
The credibility of an exam depends as much on independence and oversight as it does on technical content.
Oversight of examination decisions and impartiality risks helps protect the fairness and integrity of each scheme.
Training completion is never mandatory to sit an exam. A strict firewall separates instruction from certification decisions, and trainers do not have access to live question banks.
Declarations, restricted access and confidentiality agreements protect question security and reduce undue influence over assessment decisions.
Accreditation details are disclosed alongside a direct route to the UASL-UK certified-organisation registry so employers and candidates can check the record independently.
A credential remains meaningful when candidates have clear routes to maintain it and challenge decisions fairly.
Credentials carry a three-year validity period, with renewal used to demonstrate continued professional currency.
CPE/CEU activity supports ongoing learning as AI security threats and governance requirements change. Check the applicable scheme for its maintenance requirements.
Candidates may seek a formal review of examination results or certification decisions through an appeals process separate from the original decision.
A documented complaints route addresses concerns about examination conduct, service or certification practices.
The Code of Professional Conduct and certification rules provide grounds for suspension or revocation when credential requirements or professional obligations are not met.
Use the accreditation registry for the certification body record, or contact us about a specific certification enquiry.